Letterboxing USA - Yahoo Groups Archive

list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

12 messages in this thread | Started on 2005-03-30

list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: cadenza74 (jjcadenza@gmail.com) | Date: 2005-03-30 01:33:43 UTC

like this, don't you?
ps. I think I should do more posts

Cadenza
Sincerely,

it online.
works in email format, vs reading
for the night. We'll see how this
Well, I think I've had enough fun

cynical?
reading it anyway (: Do I sound at all
when I'm not sure there are actual humans
I don't know why they ask for feedback
to Yahoo Help in the first place.
in the email that I did before I went
do" is to try what I already explained
simply tells me that "all I need to
to do with what I asked about, or it
response, it has absolutely nothing
but on the rare occasions I get a
several times to correct a problem,
have tried to send them questions
people that work for Yahoo Help. I
convinced that there aren't any real
it could do since I am firmly
(I joined) but I'm not sure what good
I hate the new look group was great.
Okay, so I actually thought the new

what good does logic do for us?
doing things in a logical way, but
I guess I could try to get used to

was how it was intended to be read.
order they came in. I thought this
each time I want to read posts in the
more fun to have to scroll clear down
here. Don't you? I mean, it is so much
write my emails in the orders that are used
Everything looks right to me. I always
I'm not sure what everyone is complaining about.

Dear Letterboxers,




list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: ncginger2000 (ncginger2000@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-03-30 02:31:44 UTC

Knit Wit
Cheers,

done. ;-)
is the way it should be
I agree completely. This

Dear Cadenza,

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "cadenza74"
wrote:
>
> like this, don't you?
> ps. I think I should do more posts
>
> Cadenza
> Sincerely,
>
> it online.
> works in email format, vs reading
> for the night. We'll see how this
> Well, I think I've had enough fun
>
> cynical?
> reading it anyway (: Do I sound at all
> when I'm not sure there are actual humans
> I don't know why they ask for feedback
> to Yahoo Help in the first place.
> in the email that I did before I went
> do" is to try what I already explained
> simply tells me that "all I need to
> to do with what I asked about, or it
> response, it has absolutely nothing
> but on the rare occasions I get a
> several times to correct a problem,
> have tried to send them questions
> people that work for Yahoo Help. I
> convinced that there aren't any real
> it could do since I am firmly
> (I joined) but I'm not sure what good
> I hate the new look group was great.
> Okay, so I actually thought the new
>
> what good does logic do for us?
> doing things in a logical way, but
> I guess I could try to get used to
>
> was how it was intended to be read.
> order they came in. I thought this
> each time I want to read posts in the
> more fun to have to scroll clear down
> here. Don't you? I mean, it is so much
> write my emails in the orders that are used
> Everything looks right to me. I always
> I'm not sure what everyone is complaining about.
>
> Dear Letterboxers,




Re: list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: seth mandeville (pokerman117@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-03-29 19:07:28 UTC-08:00
!!taht draeh I
hteS
--- cadenza74 wrote:
>
> like this, don't you?
> ps. I think I should do more posts
>
> Cadenza
> Sincerely,
>
> it online.
> works in email format, vs reading
> for the night. We'll see how this
> Well, I think I've had enough fun
>
> cynical?
> reading it anyway (: Do I sound at all
> when I'm not sure there are actual humans
> I don't know why they ask for feedback
> to Yahoo Help in the first place.
> in the email that I did before I went
> do" is to try what I already explained
> simply tells me that "all I need to
> to do with what I asked about, or it
> response, it has absolutely nothing
> but on the rare occasions I get a
> several times to correct a problem,
> have tried to send them questions
> people that work for Yahoo Help. I
> convinced that there aren't any real
> it could do since I am firmly
> (I joined) but I'm not sure what good
> I hate the new look group was great.
> Okay, so I actually thought the new
>
> what good does logic do for us?
> doing things in a logical way, but
> I guess I could try to get used to
>
> was how it was intended to be read.
> order they came in. I thought this
> each time I want to read posts in the
> more fun to have to scroll clear down
> here. Don't you? I mean, it is so much
> write my emails in the orders that are used
> Everything looks right to me. I always
> I'm not sure what everyone is complaining about.
>
> Dear Letterboxers,
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: catbead1 (libby@twcny.rr.com) | Date: 2005-03-29 22:20:35 UTC-05:00
catbead
Mwhahahahaha.....

displays only 4.
white emptiness in the *New Streamlined look* that
shows 11 groups on my screen, and avoids the acres of
If I view "My Groups" in the "Edit My Groups" mode, it
Hey, I discovered something Yahoo hasn't wrecked yet!

for each group I was in. :-D {big toothy grin}
how many complaints they got? Personally I sent one
At least they gave the message numbers back. Wonder

to check to see if it worked before launching.
Um, guess this is something else Yahoo didn't bother
gan.... etc.
tbo..
fal...
moo...
mar...
doc...
sil...
cap...
bok...
led...
696 results starting with:
the search function to find them. Oooo, this is good,
start with "b". Yahoo eliminated every means but
Okaaaay, let me try searching for the names that

the_..., etc.
chi...
hea...
hea...
jor...
all...
the...
rag...
the_...
the_.... (I won't give the whole name)
"the". Here's what comes back, 105 results:
adventure. Try to find someone who's name start's with
Searching the 2466 member list has become an

Oh, it's CASE SENSITIVE now. *sigh*
This, when I'm looking at a message titled South Carolina...
"No matches found in the messages searched.".
Plug in "carolina" and get:
My favorite is the new search function.




>like this, don't you?
>ps. I think I should do more posts
>
>Cadenza
>Sincerely,
>
>it online.
>works in email format, vs reading
>for the night. We'll see how this
>Well, I think I've had enough fun
>
>cynical?
>reading it anyway (: Do I sound at all
>when I'm not sure there are actual humans
>I don't know why they ask for feedback
>to Yahoo Help in the first place.
>in the email that I did before I went
>do" is to try what I already explained
>simply tells me that "all I need to
>to do with what I asked about, or it
>response, it has absolutely nothing
>but on the rare occasions I get a
>several times to correct a problem,
>have tried to send them questions
>people that work for Yahoo Help. I
>convinced that there aren't any real
>it could do since I am firmly
>(I joined) but I'm not sure what good
>I hate the new look group was great.
>Okay, so I actually thought the new
>
>what good does logic do for us?
>doing things in a logical way, but
>I guess I could try to get used to
>
>was how it was intended to be read.
>order they came in. I thought this
>each time I want to read posts in the
>more fun to have to scroll clear down
>here. Don't you? I mean, it is so much
>write my emails in the orders that are used
>Everything looks right to me. I always
>I'm not sure what everyone is complaining about.
>
>Dear Letterboxers,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


Re: list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: seth mandeville (pokerman117@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-03-29 19:31:24 UTC-08:00
.gnihtyreve dna drawkcaB .etirw ot emitgnol a syug uoy
gnikat eb tsum sihT ,woW

htes
--- catbead1 wrote:
> catbead
> Mwhahahahaha.....
>
> displays only 4.
> white emptiness in the *New Streamlined look* that
> shows 11 groups on my screen, and avoids the acres
> of
> If I view "My Groups" in the "Edit My Groups" mode,
> it
> Hey, I discovered something Yahoo hasn't wrecked
> yet!
>
> for each group I was in. :-D {big toothy grin}
> how many complaints they got? Personally I sent one
> At least they gave the message numbers back. Wonder
>
> to check to see if it worked before launching.
> Um, guess this is something else Yahoo didn't bother
> gan.... etc.
> tbo..
> fal...
> moo...
> mar...
> doc...
> sil...
> cap...
> bok...
> led...
> 696 results starting with:
> the search function to find them. Oooo, this is
> good,
> start with "b". Yahoo eliminated every means but
> Okaaaay, let me try searching for the names that
>
> the_..., etc.
> chi...
> hea...
> hea...
> jor...
> all...
> the...
> rag...
> the_...
> the_.... (I won't give the whole name)
> "the". Here's what comes back, 105 results:
> adventure. Try to find someone who's name start's
> with
> Searching the 2466 member list has become an
>
> Oh, it's CASE SENSITIVE now. *sigh*
> This, when I'm looking at a message titled South
> Carolina...
> "No matches found in the messages searched.".
> Plug in "carolina" and get:
> My favorite is the new search function.
>
>
>
>
> >like this, don't you?
> >ps. I think I should do more posts
> >
> >Cadenza
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >it online.
> >works in email format, vs reading
> >for the night. We'll see how this
> >Well, I think I've had enough fun
> >
> >cynical?
> >reading it anyway (: Do I sound at all
> >when I'm not sure there are actual humans
> >I don't know why they ask for feedback
> >to Yahoo Help in the first place.
> >in the email that I did before I went
> >do" is to try what I already explained
> >simply tells me that "all I need to
> >to do with what I asked about, or it
> >response, it has absolutely nothing
> >but on the rare occasions I get a
> >several times to correct a problem,
> >have tried to send them questions
> >people that work for Yahoo Help. I
> >convinced that there aren't any real
> >it could do since I am firmly
> >(I joined) but I'm not sure what good
> >I hate the new look group was great.
> >Okay, so I actually thought the new
> >
> >what good does logic do for us?
> >doing things in a logical way, but
> >I guess I could try to get used to
> >
> >was how it was intended to be read.
> >order they came in. I thought this
> >each time I want to read posts in the
> >more fun to have to scroll clear down
> >here. Don't you? I mean, it is so much
> >write my emails in the orders that are used
> >Everything looks right to me. I always
> >I'm not sure what everyone is complaining about.
> >
> >Dear Letterboxers,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: Pats DuBos (votremerci@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-03-29 19:35:33 UTC-08:00
no, not really. lolol. I take notes for gossip columns writing backwards. If anyone asks I tell them to find a mirror and read what they should have to wait to read later.

It's fun Seth.

And is the new look really that bad? Haven't ventured out of emailland yet to see.



seth mandeville wrote:
.gnihtyreve dna drawkcaB .etirw ot emitgnol a syug uoy
gnikat eb tsum sihT ,woW

htes
--- catbead1 wrote:
> catbead
> Mwhahahahaha....


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: seth mandeville (pokerman117@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-03-29 19:41:46 UTC-08:00
,taP
.skcus tI Can you really write backwards while taking
notes. If I were to spill a box of toothpicks on the
ground could you tell me how many there are? If so,
we're going to Vegas.

Thoroughly impressed,
Seth
--- Pats DuBos wrote:
> no, not really. lolol. I take notes for gossip
> columns writing backwards. If anyone asks I tell
> them to find a mirror and read what they should have
> to wait to read later.
>
> It's fun Seth.
>
> And is the new look really that bad? Haven't
> ventured out of emailland yet to see.
>
>
>
> seth mandeville wrote:
> .gnihtyreve dna drawkcaB .etirw ot emitgnol a syug
> uoy
> gnikat e tsum sihT ,woW
>
> htes
> --- catbead1 wrote:
> > catbead
> > Mwhahahahaha....
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Make Yahoo! your home page
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: dvn2rckr (dvn2rckr@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-03-30 05:08:48 UTC

Maybe this new yahoogroups look is just part of an early April Fools'
Day joke? We'll all awake on 2 Apr and everything will be back to the
old, tried & true, just as user-unfriendly interface we all got so
used to. Same old awful message search capabilities and all. ;)
Still wondering why they flipped the messages from oldest to newest at
top. Yuck--it doesn't make sense logically... dvn2r ckr




Re: list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: catbead1 (libby@twcny.rr.com) | Date: 2005-03-30 00:55:15 UTC-05:00
>Maybe this new yahoogroups look is just part of an early April Fools'
>Day joke?

This actually ran thru my mind. :-)
What other reason would they have to take ONLY the important
components and delete, reverse, change the meaning of, or make
frustratingly time consuming to use (and so many unimportant things
left alone)?
-a change was wanted, so someone who didn't understand how it worked,
made all the decisions.
-a non-English speaking person did it...someone who does NOT read
from left to right.
-They were in a rush to get it out and didn't (have time to) test it.
-It fits the same layout as "Yahoo! News" and they figured they would
consolidate.
-April Fools!...please, please, please, Please let me wake up and let
it be. If it is, I might believe there really is a bunny that lays
chocolate eggs. :-)

Cheers,
catbead

list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: speedsquare_lbxr (ruhlette@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-03-30 12:39:48 UTC

Now that I have been thoroughly entertained with the recent posts, I'd like to say I am able
to write in mirror image as fast as I can in "normal" direction, and it is very legible. It's not
something I practice, I comes quite naturally. Mother said when I was 3 and learning to
write my name for the first time, I wrote in mirror image, letter by letter. I wonder if
anyone can tell me if there is some explanation to this phenomenon(?) Everyone who has
seen me write calls it "weird." I am left-handed most of the time, but again, I can write
with my right hand, not well. Help me dispel the ignorance!

speedsquare

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, seth mandeville wrote:
> ,taP
> .skcus tI Can you really write backwards while taking
> notes. If I were to spill a box of toothpicks on the
> ground could you tell me how many there are? If so,
> we're going to Vegas.
>
> Thoroughly impressed,
> Seth
> --- Pats DuBos wrote:
> > no, not really. lolol. I take notes for gossip
> > columns writing backwards. If anyone asks I tell
> > them to find a mirror and read what they should have
> > to wait to read later.
> >
> > It's fun Seth.
> >
> > seth mandeville wrote:
> > .gnihtyreve dna drawkcaB .etirw ot emitgnol a syug
> > uoy
> > gnikat e tsum sihT ,woW
> >
> > htes




Re: list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: Letterbug (pixmel@earthlink.net) | Date: 2005-03-30 10:23:51 UTC-05:00
I wouldn't worry about it. Just chalk it up to what David Letterman used to refer to as "stupid human tricks". Just one of those talents that everyone has.

I can write backwards and upside down at the same time. Not as fast as I write normally, but still at a fairly good pace. Oh, and I can cross my eyes and rotate them around independently from each other.

You're not weird . . . just gifted. :-D

----- Original Message -----
From: speedsquare_lbxr
To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 7:39 AM
Subject: list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:




Now that I have been thoroughly entertained with the recent posts, I'd like to say I am able
to write in mirror image as fast as I can in "normal" direction, and it is very legible. It's not
something I practice, I comes quite naturally. Mother said when I was 3 and learning to
write my name for the first time, I wrote in mirror image, letter by letter. I wonder if
anyone can tell me if there is some explanation to this phenomenon(?) Everyone who has
seen me write calls it "weird." I am left-handed most of the time, but again, I can write
with my right hand, not well. Help me dispel the ignorance!

speedsquare

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, seth mandeville wrote:
> ,taP
> .skcus tI Can you really write backwards while taking
> notes. If I were to spill a box of toothpicks on the
> ground could you tell me how many there are? If so,
> we're going to Vegas.
>
> Thoroughly impressed,
> Seth
> --- Pats DuBos wrote:
> > no, not really. lolol. I take notes for gossip
> > columns writing backwards. If anyone asks I tell
> > them to find a mirror and read what they should have
> > to wait to read later.
> >
> > It's fun Seth.
> >
> > seth mandeville wrote:
> > .gnihtyreve dna drawkcaB .etirw ot emitgnol a syug
> > uoy
> > gnikat e tsum sihT ,woW
> >
> > htes







Yahoo! Groups Links








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


list the of look new the hate I [LbNA] Re:

From: speedsquare_lbxr (ruhlette@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-03-30 21:18:51 UTC

Ooh, upside down!?! That's something to try next. Gifted? Just unique, like everyone else.
Now if I could just talk and pay attention while I'm driving, I'd be set.

speedsquare

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Letterbug" wrote:
> I wouldn't worry about it. Just chalk it up to what David Letterman used to refer to as
"stupid human tricks". Just one of those talents that everyone has.
>
> I can write backwards and upside down at the same time. Not as fast as I write normally,
but still at a fairly good pace. Oh, and I can cross my eyes and rotate them around
independently from each other.
>
> You're not weird . . . just gifted. :-D